The FDA’s pursuit of “natural” food dyes is a silent gamble with the nation’s food supply, threatening to undermine a critical part of the food system: domestically produced synthetic dyes.

Why Synthetic Dyes are Trusted

Synthetic dyes have undergone intense testing and regulation. In contrast, natural dyes are agricultural commodities, making them subject to varying factors such as weather conditions, crop variability, and global politics.

• Cochineal (Carmine), Annatto, Turmeric, Paprika, and Chili extracts come from various countries, including Peru, Brazil, Mexico, India, China, and others.

These natural dyes are not regulated to the same standards as synthetic dyes, making their production and sourcing highly unpredictable.

Food Fraud and National Security Concerns

Food fraud is not a theoretical issue; it’s already happening. EMA (Economically Motivated Adulteration) involves adding chemicals to mimic high-quality ingredients or diluting them for profit. In some cases, this may result in the use of dangerous substances like lead salts. In 2023, lead-contaminated cinnamon was found in applesauce pouches, which could lead to EMA in more complex, multicomponent natural dyes.

1. TURMERIC HAS BEEN TARGETED FOR EMA, WITH INDIAN SUPPLIERS ADDING LEAD CHROMATE — A NEUROTOXIN — TO ENHANCE TURMERIC’S COLOR AND DISGUISE POOR QUALITY.

The FDA does not test natural dyes in the same way as synthetic dyes, which makes it difficult to detect EMA.

Backdoor Policy Driven by Ideology, Not Science

The FDA’s shift to “natural” food dyes is not based on scientific evidence, but rather on public perception and consumer pressure. Chemophobia is driving the demand for “clean” labels, which are often achieved through the use of synthetic dyes. If consumers want to avoid synthetic dyes, they already have the option to do so. Food safety is not just a public health issue, but also a national security issue. Food safety is vital to national security, as the supply of essential ingredients can be disrupted by events such as unrest, embargoes, or fraud. The ripple effect can lead to delayed production, recalls, price spikes, and lost consumer trust.

Science-Based Public Education, Not Fear-Mongering

Instead of relying on the precautionary principle, the FDA should focus on science-based public education to address concerns about synthetic dyes. The pandemic has highlighted the importance of resilient supply chains, and this approach can be applied to the food system to ensure food safety.

A Better Approach

Rather than abandoning synthetic dyes, the FDA should bolster its testing capabilities for lead and other adulterants in natural colors and spices. This would not only protect consumers but also reduce the risk of food fraud. The Center for Truth in Science recommends a multi-faceted approach to address the concerns surrounding synthetic dyes. Drs. Lyle D. Burgoon and Richard Williams, both Board Members at the Center for Truth in Science, emphasize the need for science-based public education to address concerns about synthetic dyes. By making informed decisions based on scientific evidence, the FDA can ensure the food supply remains safe and reliable.

I’ve seen firsthand the devastating effects of food fraud. As a former FDA official, I urge you to take a closer look at the risks associated with shifting to “natural” food dyes. — Robert F.